Can an Unrecorded Grant Deed Defeat a Later IRS Tax Lien?

IRS and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Work Together to Charge Medicare and Tax Fraud
June 1, 2019
tax attorney riverisde
Plaintiff in Americans with Disabilities Act Lawsuits Indicted
June 3, 2019

Can an Unrecorded Grant Deed Defeat a Later IRS Tax Lien?

Yes, an unrecorded grant deed can defeat a later federal IRS tax lien, but there are some exceptions such as “nominee” scenarios and fraudulent conveyance statutes.

A grant deed has to be in good faith and intended to be effective to defeat the IRS. If, in reality, the grantor retains an interest in the property while not being on title, the grantee could be considered a mere “nominee” and the IRS may still reach the property. In addition, “fraudulent conveyance” statutes can be used to reach property that is transferred for less than adequate consideration, when the taxpayer knew or should have known about the tax liability, and when the taxpayer had actual fraudulent intent or was insolvent. For advice on specific circumstances, a competent tax lawyer should be consulted.

A federal tax lien statutorily arises against all property and rights to property owned by the taxpayers as of the assessment date under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6321 and 6322 when notice and demand for payment is made (e.g., a bill is issued) and the tax is not immediately paid.  Because this lien arises even though not recorded, it is sometimes called a “secret lien.”

Under 26 U.S.C. § 6323(a) and (f), the lien imposed by Section 6321 is not valid against any purchaser until the notice of federal tax lien is filed in the county where the real property sits.  In other words, a federal tax lien only affects a purchaser who acquires the real property after the notice of federal tax lien has been recorded. Furthermore, because the statutory language of 26 U.S.C. § 6321 only provides for a lien upon “all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to [the person liable to pay any tax,” the IRS only steps into the shoes of the taxpayer.  This means that the IRS has no greater rights to the real property than does the taxpayer himself. 

For example, a taxpayer husband that was divested of his equitable interest in the marital home by a Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) Judgment has no further right to the property. In that scenario, even if his ex-wife fails to record either the judgment or the resulting interspousal grant deed before a federal IRS tax lien is filed against the husband for his later tax return, the IRS will have no interest in the property (just as the husband does not) even if the IRS records before the ex-wife does.  See United States v. Gibbons, 71 F.3d 1496, 1501 (10th Cir. 1995); Thomson v. United States, 66 F.3d 160 (8th Cir. 1995).

Posted on 06/02/2019 by Daniel Layton.